P

This is the strictest category of donor restriction: the gift itself is locked away permanently by the donor’s own terms, and no board vote or financial pressure can override that. A $1 million endowment gift for scholarships means that $1 million stays invested indefinitely — only the investment income it generates each year becomes available to actually award as scholarships.

Under current GAAP (FASB ASU 2016-14), this category is technically folded into the broader “net assets with donor restrictions” classification on the face of the statements, but it’s still tracked and disclosed separately in the notes, since the permanence of the restriction is a materially different fact for readers to know than a temporary, time-limited one.

Because permanently restricted principal can never be tapped even in a cash crisis, organizations need to be deliberate about how much new money they accept with this restriction versus as a temporarily restricted or unrestricted gift — permanence is a real, lasting constraint, not just a label.

If a donor signs a pledge form committing to $10,000 over four years for a capital campaign, GAAP requires recognizing the full $10,000 as contribution revenue immediately, discounted to present value if the payments stretch out over more than a year — even though only a fraction of the cash has actually arrived.

The key word is “unconditional.” A pledge that depends on some future event outside the donor’s control — “I’ll give $10,000 if the campaign also raises the other $490,000 needed” — is a conditional promise, and conditional promises aren’t recognized as revenue until the condition is actually met.

Because pledge revenue and pledge cash collection happen on different timelines, organizations need to track both: the pledge receivable balance for the balance sheet and revenue recognition, and a separate collection schedule for cash flow planning — conflating the two is a common source of budget-to-actual confusion during multi-year campaigns.

A nonprofit theater selling tickets, a nonprofit clinic billing on a sliding fee scale, and a membership association collecting annual dues are all generating program service revenue — earned income tied directly to delivering the mission, rather than contributed income from donors or grantors.

This distinction matters on Form 990, which reports program service revenue separately from contributions and grants, and it matters for an organization’s own financial resilience: earned revenue is typically more predictable and less restricted than grant funding, which can make an organization less vulnerable to any single funder’s shifting priorities.

Program service revenue that regularly and substantially exceeds the cost of providing the related service can also raise unrelated business income questions if the activity isn’t substantially related to the organization’s exempt purpose — a line worth watching as earned-revenue strategies grow more common across the sector.